[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Apr 2024 17:43:11 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> The issue seems to be releases containing binary data for unit tests,
> instead of source or scripts to generate that data. In this case, that
> binary data was used to smuggle in heavily obfuscated object code.
If this is the crucial point, we could put in the coding standards
(or the maintainers' guide) not to do this.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, (continued)
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Richard Stallman, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Richard Stallman, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Richard Stallman, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Richard Stallman, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Bob Friesenhahn, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/04/03
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor,
Richard Stallman <=