[Bug-tar] [BUG] tar-1.13.25 sets unexpected time-stamp of directory

[TAMUKI Shoichi]

Hello,

tar-1.13 sets desirable time-stamp of directory.  However, tar-1.13.25
sets unexpected time-stamp of directory.

Those sources are:
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/tar/tar-1.13.tar.gz
ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/tar/tar-1.13.25.tar.gz

Here are the sample operations:

skylark:~/work$ ls -fl --fu
total 37
drwxr-xr-x   2 tamuki   users        1024 Mon Sep 08 18:35:49 2003 ./
drwx--x--x  69 tamuki   users        6144 Mon Sep 08 18:28:37 2003 ../
-rw-r--r--   1 tamuki   users       10240 Mon Sep 08 18:24:38 2003 test1.tar
-rw-r--r--   1 tamuki   users       10240 Mon Sep 08 18:25:38 2003 test2.tar
-rw-r--r--   1 tamuki   users       10240 Mon Sep 08 18:35:21 2003 test3.tar
skylark:~/work$ tar tvf test1.tar
drwxr-xr-x tamuki/users      0 2001-12-01 15:00 testdir/
-rw-r--r-- tamuki/users      0 2001-12-01 07:00 testdir/testfile1
skylark:~/work$ tar tvf test2.tar
drwxr-xr-x tamuki/users      0 2001-12-01 21:00 testdir/
-rw-r--r-- tamuki/users      0 2001-12-01 09:00 testdir/testfile2
skylark:~/work$ tar tvf test3.tar
-rw-r--r-- tamuki/users      0 2001-12-01 11:00 testdir/testfile2
skylark:~/work$ tar-1.13 xf test1.tar
skylark:~/work$ ls -fl --fu testdir
total 2
drwxr-xr-x   2 tamuki   users        1024 Sat Dec 01 15:00:00 2001 ./
drwxr-xr-x   3 tamuki   users        1024 Mon Sep 08 18:36:58 2003 ../
-rw-r--r--   1 tamuki   users           0 Sat Dec 01 07:00:00 2001 testfile1
skylark:~/work$ tar-1.13 xf test2.tar
skylark:~/work$ ls -fl --fu testdir
total 2
drwxr-xr-x   2 tamuki   users        1024 Sat Dec 01 21:00:00 2001 ./   #OK!
drwxr-xr-x   3 tamuki   users        1024 Mon Sep 08 18:36:58 2003 ../
-rw-r--r--   1 tamuki   users           0 Sat Dec 01 07:00:00 2001 testfile1
-rw-r--r--   1 tamuki   users           0 Sat Dec 01 09:00:00 2001 testfile2
skylark:~/work$ tar-1.13 xf test3.tar
skylark:~/work$ ls -fl --fu testdir
total 2
drwxr-xr-x   2 tamuki   users        1024 Sat Dec 01 21:00:00 2001 ./   #OK!
drwxr-xr-x   3 tamuki   users        1024 Mon Sep 08 18:36:58 2003 ../
-rw-r--r--   1 tamuki   users           0 Sat Dec 01 07:00:00 2001 testfile1
-rw-r--r--   1 tamuki   users           0 Sat Dec 01 11:00:00 2001 testfile2
skylark:~/work$ rm -r testdir
skylark:~/work$ tar-1.13.25 xf test1.tar
skylark:~/work$ ls -fl --fu testdir
total 2
drwxr-xr-x   2 tamuki   users        1024 Sat Dec 01 15:00:00 2001 ./
drwxr-xr-x   3 tamuki   users        1024 Mon Sep 08 18:40:03 2003 ../
-rw-r--r--   1 tamuki   users           0 Sat Dec 01 07:00:00 2001 testfile1
skylark:~/work$ tar-1.13.25 xf test2.tar
skylark:~/work$ ls -fl --fu testdir
total 2
drwxr-xr-x   2 tamuki   users        1024 Mon Sep 08 18:40:17 2003 ./   #NG!
drwxr-xr-x   3 tamuki   users        1024 Mon Sep 08 18:40:03 2003 ../
-rw-r--r--   1 tamuki   users           0 Sat Dec 01 07:00:00 2001 testfile1
-rw-r--r--   1 tamuki   users           0 Sat Dec 01 09:00:00 2001 testfile2
skylark:~/work$ tar-1.13.25 xf test3.tar
skylark:~/work$ ls -fl --fu testdir
total 2
drwxr-xr-x   2 tamuki   users        1024 Mon Sep 08 18:40:38 2003 ./   #NG!
drwxr-xr-x   3 tamuki   users        1024 Mon Sep 08 18:40:03 2003 ../
-rw-r--r--   1 tamuki   users           0 Sat Dec 01 07:00:00 2001 testfile1
-rw-r--r--   1 tamuki   users           0 Sat Dec 01 11:00:00 2001 testfile2

I think that the behaviour should be improved.

Thanks and Regards,
TAMUKI Shoichi