[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] Re: [patch] O_NOATIME support
From: |
Ian Turner |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] Re: [patch] O_NOATIME support |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Oct 2005 06:16:18 -0700 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.1 |
> Well, the interface itself does not seem to be well designed.
Maybe not, but it's what we got. This feature was contraversial enough to the
kernel folks that there is zero chance of introducing a new interface at this
time.
> How do you like to be sure if you are on a Linux version that just ignores
> O_NOATIME and thus never returns EINVAL? This does not look to be a good
> idea unless the O_NOATIME flag would have been implemented this way from
> the very beginning.
Well, right now all kernels work that way. In future, you'll probably have to
guess based on some heuristic. I basically view the non-use at present of
EINVAL as a kernel bug, which will be fixed, and not a change in the
interface.
--Ian