[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] p7zip support
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] p7zip support |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Jan 2006 18:40:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 07:13:57PM +0200, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> Robert Millan <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > That's just temporary space. The important is saving storage space in large
> > data sets.
>
> Sure, that's temporary space. But anyway, one must have twice as much
> space available when restoring from a 7za archive than when restoring
> from an archive compressed with another compression method. And that's
> a big drawback.
Yes, but:
- It depends on what you do. In my example (thousands of small files), you
get a significant gain in permanent space for a minimal cost in temporary
space.
- It's only an implementation issue. It can be fixed later by implementing
streaming properly.
- It doesn't need to be better in *everything*. p7zip is also much slower
than gzip or even bzip2. Giving users the choice can't make it worse (if/when
they don't want it, they won't use it).
--
Robert Millan
- [Bug-tar] [PATCH] p7zip support, Robert Millan, 2006/01/02
- Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] p7zip support, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2006/01/02
- Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] p7zip support, Robert Millan, 2006/01/02
- Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] p7zip support, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2006/01/02
- Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] p7zip support, Robert Millan, 2006/01/02
- Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] p7zip support, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2006/01/02
- Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] p7zip support,
Robert Millan <=
- Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] p7zip support, Doug McLaren, 2006/01/11
- Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] p7zip support, Robert Millan, 2006/01/11
- Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] p7zip support, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2006/01/13
- Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] p7zip support, Robert Millan, 2006/01/11
Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] p7zip support, Joerg Schilling, 2006/01/02