[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-tar] Tar symlinks questions
From: |
yamu wasp |
Subject: |
[Bug-tar] Tar symlinks questions |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Feb 2006 18:10:24 -0800 (PST) |
In the tar build script of slackware-10.2 on down to
slackware-8.1 it says they still use tar-1.13 because:
"...
# This old version is the only one that won't clobber
synlinks, e.g.:
# someone moves /opt to /usr/opt and makes a symlink.
With newer
# versions of tar, installing any new package will
remove the /opt
# symlink and plop down a new directory there.
# Well, there's a lot of other bugs (the remote stuff
particularly I'm
# told is flaky) in tar-1.13, so it'll only be here
now for use by the
# Slackware package utils. And, we'll even let people
remove it and
# the pkgutils will still try to work (but eventually
they'll pay the
# price :)
..."
ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-10.2/source/a/tar/tar.SlackBuild
I think it was referring to the "tar-1.13.25
overwrites symlinks to directories when extracting"
bug (I don't know any of the others):
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-utils/2002-04/msg00158.html
But I looked at the changelogs page (on the GNU Tar
Project site), and didn't see anything about the bug.
QUESTIONS:
1) Are the symlinks and/or other bugs fixed?
2) Also, is there a way to use tar to only overwrite
symlinks with other symlinks (not directories)?
(If not, that's a feature I would want in the next
version of GNU Tar.)
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
- [Bug-tar] Tar symlinks questions,
yamu wasp <=