[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] tar man page
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] tar man page |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jul 2007 02:22:38 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
On Tuesday 10 July 2007, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> If it is their choice to provide it, then let them provide it. Some of man
> pages I saw (those distributed with Slackware, for example)
> contain much more info than help2man would produce, and we'd do their
> users a very doubtful favor if we replace a third party man page saying
> something with our page saying nothing useful at all.
is allowing someone to maintain it for tar out of the question ? after all,
as you already noted, package maintainers are often already doing the
maintenance work, but only in a place where a subset of the people out there
benefit instead of all tar users ...
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar man page, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar man page, Joerg Schilling, 2007/07/10
- [Bug-tar] Re: tar man page, Matthew Woehlke, 2007/07/10
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: tar man page, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2007/07/11
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: tar man page, Benno Schulenberg, 2007/07/11
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: tar man page, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2007/07/12
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: tar man page, Benno Schulenberg, 2007/07/12
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: tar man page, Hugh Sasse, 2007/07/12
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: tar man page, Mike Frysinger, 2007/07/13
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: tar man page, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2007/07/13
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: tar man page, Benno Schulenberg, 2007/07/13
Re: [Bug-tar] tar man page,
Mike Frysinger <=