[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] tar 1.23 Solaris regression
From: |
Joerg Schilling |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] tar 1.23 Solaris regression |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Aug 2010 11:24:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
nail 11.22 3/20/05 |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 08/02/10 12:28, Eric Blake wrote:
> > since tar does have the likelihood
> > of creating children, yes, it should play nicely and restore privileges
> > before exec()ing.
>
> Yes, that makes sense. However, the proposed patch isn't quite
> right, since it restores PRIV_SYS_LINKDIR even if the user had
> removed that privilege before invoking 'tar'.
What is the reason for playing with privileges inside a tar implementaton?
Jörg
--
EMail:address@hidden (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
address@hidden (uni)
address@hidden (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
- [Bug-tar] tar 1.23 Solaris regression, Petr Sumbera, 2010/08/02
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar 1.23 Solaris regression, David Bartley, 2010/08/02
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar 1.23 Solaris regression, Eric Blake, 2010/08/02
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar 1.23 Solaris regression, Petr Sumbera, 2010/08/10
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar 1.23 Solaris regression, David Bartley, 2010/08/10
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar 1.23 Solaris regression, Petr Sumbera, 2010/08/10
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar 1.23 Solaris regression, David Bartley, 2010/08/10