[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:58:24 +0300 |
Kevin Fox <address@hidden> ha escrit:
> It can use SIGTSTP/SIGCONT instead, but to the same effect I think.
> There are a few other ones a terminal can issue too like SIGTTIN and
> SIGTTOU.
Each signal has its own purpose. Delivering SIGTTIN where there is
no tty input for background process does not seem a good idea.
For instance, tar itself does not handle neither of these signals (it
doesn't have to, anyway), so when delivered any of them it will simply
stop, as their semantics dictates (see man 7 signal). That's perhaps
not what you want.
Regards,
Sergey
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Andreas Dilger, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Andreas Dilger, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Kevin Fox, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/28
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Andreas Dilger, 2011/09/28
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/28
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Andreas Dilger, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Chuck Swiger, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Kevin Fox, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read,
Sergey Poznyakoff <=
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Kevin Fox, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Kevin Fox, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2011/09/26
Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/26
Re: [Bug-tar] Tar short read, Tim Kientzle, 2011/09/27