[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] Just updated debian wheezy to wheezy-backports, tar now 1.
From: |
Gene Heskett |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] Just updated debian wheezy to wheezy-backports, tar now 1.27-1 |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Jan 2016 19:03:07 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.10 (enterprise35 0.20100827.1168748) |
On Wednesday 13 January 2016 17:40:57 Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:10:41 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > tar -cpsf indices.tar.${TAPENAME} $INDICE_PATH 2>&1 >>
> > dd.report$TAPENAME tar -cpsf configuration.tar.${TAPENAME} $CONFPATH
> > 2>&1 >> dd.report.$TAPENAME
>
> (For what it's worth, I believe "-p" also has no effect during a
> create operation, though tar doesn't abort with an error for that
> combination.
>
> From
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/tar/manual/html_section/tar_70.html#IDX52
>1
The $64k question, Nathan, which doesn't seem to be defined in that link,
is "does it record every nuance of a files permissions and attributes
regardless?"
A backup that does not contain that info, and recovers it and applies
them on recovery from some version of defaults that tar considers safe,
isn't much of a backup. A full, bare metal recovery would, TBT, not be
worth doing when you would need to track down and restore working
ownership and perms to thousands of files is not something I would ever
tolerate.
Thanks Nathan
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>