bug-vcdimager
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[VCDImager Bugs/Devel] XML broken ?


From: Adrian
Subject: [VCDImager Bugs/Devel] XML broken ?
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 22:23:06 +0100

Hi

I have a problem with the XML. I run

> vcdxgen  dbz-70-1.mpg dbz-70-2.mpg dbz-71-1.mpg dbz-71-2.mpg dbz-72-1.mpg 
dbz-72-2.mpg 
>vcdxbuild videocd.xml

and the responses were:

>(Super) VideoCD xml description created successfully as `videocd.xml'

XML was created, but vcdxbuild reported:

>unsupported doctype (pubid: (null), sysid: videocd.xml) encountered

It happened with the 0.7.0-x version of SuSE 7.3, and also with: 0.7.9-1 from 
your ftp. Could it depend on libxml2 ? The version on my machine is: 
libxml2-2.4.10-5

It was the RPM binary from your site, so no broken gcc was used

additional Info:

> ldd `which vcdxbuild`
        libxml2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 (0x40023000)
        libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x400c0000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x400cf000)
        libpopt.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpopt.so.0 (0x400f1000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x400f8000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)

> uname -a
Linux adispc 2.4.16 #3 Mon Nov 26 21:59:27 CET 2001 i686 unknown

The auto-created XML is:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE videocd PUBLIC "-//GNU//DTD VideoCD//EN" 
"http://www.gnu.org/software/vcdimager/videocd.dtd";>
<!-- commandline used: vcdxgen dbz-70-1.mpg dbz-70-2.mpg dbz-71-1.mpg 
dbz-71-2.mpg dbz-72-1.mpg dbz-72-2.mpg -->
<videocd xmlns="http://www.gnu.org/software/vcdimager/1.0/"; class="vcd" 
version="2.0">
  <info>
    <album-id></album-id>
    <volume-count>1</volume-count>
    <volume-number>1</volume-number>
    <restriction>0</restriction>
  </info>
  <pvd>
    <volume-id>VIDEOCD</volume-id>
    <system-id>CD-RTOS CD-BRIDGE</system-id>
    <application-id></application-id>
    <preparer-id/>
    <publisher-id/>
  </pvd>
  <sequence-items>
    <sequence-item src="dbz-70-1.mpg" id="sequence-00"/>
    <sequence-item src="dbz-70-2.mpg" id="sequence-01"/>
    <sequence-item src="dbz-71-1.mpg" id="sequence-02"/>
    <sequence-item src="dbz-71-2.mpg" id="sequence-03"/>
    <sequence-item src="dbz-72-1.mpg" id="sequence-04"/>
    <sequence-item src="dbz-72-2.mpg" id="sequence-05"/>
  </sequence-items>
  <pbc>
    <playlist id="lid-000">
      <next ref="lid-001"/>
      <return ref="lid-end"/>
      <wait>5</wait>
      <autowait>0</autowait>
      <play-item ref="sequence-00"/>
    </playlist>
    <playlist id="lid-001">
      <prev ref="lid-000"/>
      <next ref="lid-002"/>
      <return ref="lid-end"/>
      <wait>5</wait>
      <autowait>0</autowait>
      <play-item ref="sequence-01"/>
    </playlist>
    <playlist id="lid-002">
      <prev ref="lid-001"/>
      <next ref="lid-003"/>
      <return ref="lid-end"/>
      <wait>5</wait>
      <autowait>0</autowait>
      <play-item ref="sequence-02"/>
    </playlist>
    <playlist id="lid-003">
      <prev ref="lid-002"/>
      <next ref="lid-004"/>
      <return ref="lid-end"/>
      <wait>5</wait>
      <autowait>0</autowait>
      <play-item ref="sequence-03"/>
    </playlist>
    <playlist id="lid-004">
      <prev ref="lid-003"/>
      <next ref="lid-005"/>
      <return ref="lid-end"/>
      <wait>5</wait>
      <autowait>0</autowait>
      <play-item ref="sequence-04"/>
    </playlist>
    <playlist id="lid-005">
      <prev ref="lid-004"/>
      <next ref="lid-end"/>
      <return ref="lid-end"/>
      <wait>5</wait>
      <autowait>0</autowait>
      <play-item ref="sequence-05"/>
    </playlist>
    <endlist id="lid-end" rejected="true"/>
  </pbc>
</videocd>

it seems to be valid, and I see no differences (syntactical) to the examples. 
Maybe the error will tell me something else ? Or is this realy a Bug ? At 
least vcdxgen seems to produce non-working XML.

I have also tried with filled <preparer-id> and/or <publisher-id> Tags, also 
with CDI apps in <filesystem>, but it seems pubid:(null) has nothing to do 
with <publisher-id> Tags. Is it an undocumented new Tag or attribute ?

Adi

Adrian



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]