Re: [Bug-xnee] Two question about Xnee

[Henrik Sandklef]

thanks, made a similar fix (now in CVS).

.. and to the one's who really want to discuss if it's good if glibc is 
more forgiving than Solaris. I am not sure. But I am sure that that I 
made a woops.

firebush wrote:
> > hi
> >
> >  and thanks for your report.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > I would go for glic being nicer when "following" NULL pointers in printf
> > calls. Solaris' libc crashes when printing a NULL pointer.
>
> The segfault can be worked around by changing the fprintf for the
> xd->plugin_name to (in case it's NULL, as you pointed out Henrik):
>
> 1593    fprintf (out,  "%s       %s\n",
> 1594             xnee_xns_key2string(XNEE_PLUGIN_KEY),
> 1595             xd->plugin_name ? xd->plugin_name : "<NULL>" );
>
> That in the xnee_print_xnee_settings function in the xnee-3.03/libxnee/src
> directory.
>
> When I make that change, do a 'gmake clean; gmake; gmake install' from
> xnee-3.03, I don't get the segfault.