Re: Re: Zebra & OSPF

[chris476]

> 
> From: Kevin Benton <address@hidden>
> Date: 2003/10/08 Wed PM 09:34:33 EDT
> To: Paul Jakma <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: Zebra & OSPF
> 
> Personally, my preference would be that all the daemons would handle
> their own configurations.  If I'd had my wishes, zebra would have all
> the routing daemons embedded into it and run as one daemon instead of
> multiple independent daemons.  That would make managing the system
> easier and help it really work more like a Cisco router.

Or not work?? You assume that working like a Cisco router is a good thing...
Personally I would rather see a JunOs-like CLI .. Is anyone aware of 
sub-project(s) to this end?

> For those that
> are working on their Cisco certifications, it would definitely make
> Zebra a tool to use to simulate another router.

You should check out mrt for this I think...

> 
> Kevin
> 
> On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 18:41, Paul Jakma wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Kevin Benton wrote:
> > 
> > > in the saved Zebra.conf (as saved by Zebra with a write mem
> > > command), it fails to start because Zebra doesn't recognize the
> > > commands.
> > 
> > Yes, very annoying that.
> > 
> > You can google for or search the zebra list archive on 
> > marc.theaimsgroup.com for "vtysh write config" patch, which makes 
> > vtysh tell the daemons to write out their own files, rather than 
> > write its own Zebra.conf (behaviour is configurable). In fact, its 
> > at:
> > 
> >     http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=zebra&m=103339489419651&w=2
> > 
> > Quagga has this patch.
> > 
> > regards,
> 
> -- 
> Kevin Benton <address@hidden>
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Bug-zebra mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-zebra