bug-zebra
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RedHat 7.3 and zebra ?


From: Paul Jakma
Subject: Re: RedHat 7.3 and zebra ?
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 00:33:14 +0000 (GMT)

Hi Hugues,

On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Hugues VAN PETEGHEM wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I use Zebra to support routing protocols in a little experimental
> network.  But my OSPF (and RIP) routes don't want to use the
> kernel's routes and so are labelled as inactive :

hmm..

> routeur_pc01# sh ip route 
> Codes: K - kernel route, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, O - OSPF,
>        B - BGP, > - selected route, * - FIB route
> 
> K>* 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, eth0
> C * 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, eth0
> K>* 10.0.1.0/24 is directly connected, eth1
> C * 10.0.1.0/24 is directly connected, eth1
> O   10.0.12.0/24 [110/10] is directly connected, eth2, 00:14:29

this route is inactive because there is a connected route.

> K>* 10.0.12.0/24 is directly connected, eth2
> C * 10.0.12.0/24 is directly connected, eth2
> O   10.0.14.0/24 [110/10] is directly connected, eth3, 00:14:29

ditto.

> K>* 10.0.14.0/24 is directly connected, eth3
> C * 10.0.14.0/24 is directly connected, eth3
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> O   10.0.34.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.14.2 inactive, 00:13:29
> ----------------------------------------------------------------

ah. what does 'sho ip ro 10.0.14.2' say?

further, if you do 'sho ip ospf nei', are you fully adjacent with 
that neighbour?

> Could you help me to find a solution to my problem ?

strange.

> Thanking you in advance :
> 
> H

regards,
-- 
Paul Jakma      address@hidden  address@hidden  Key ID: 64A2FF6A
        warning: do not ever send email to address@hidden
Fortune:
To the systems programmer, users and applications serve only to provide a
test load.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]