[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RedHat 7.3 and zebra ?
From: |
Paul Jakma |
Subject: |
Re: RedHat 7.3 and zebra ? |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Dec 2003 00:33:14 +0000 (GMT) |
Hi Hugues,
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Hugues VAN PETEGHEM wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use Zebra to support routing protocols in a little experimental
> network. But my OSPF (and RIP) routes don't want to use the
> kernel's routes and so are labelled as inactive :
hmm..
> routeur_pc01# sh ip route
> Codes: K - kernel route, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, O - OSPF,
> B - BGP, > - selected route, * - FIB route
>
> K>* 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, eth0
> C * 10.0.0.0/24 is directly connected, eth0
> K>* 10.0.1.0/24 is directly connected, eth1
> C * 10.0.1.0/24 is directly connected, eth1
> O 10.0.12.0/24 [110/10] is directly connected, eth2, 00:14:29
this route is inactive because there is a connected route.
> K>* 10.0.12.0/24 is directly connected, eth2
> C * 10.0.12.0/24 is directly connected, eth2
> O 10.0.14.0/24 [110/10] is directly connected, eth3, 00:14:29
ditto.
> K>* 10.0.14.0/24 is directly connected, eth3
> C * 10.0.14.0/24 is directly connected, eth3
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> O 10.0.34.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.14.2 inactive, 00:13:29
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
ah. what does 'sho ip ro 10.0.14.2' say?
further, if you do 'sho ip ospf nei', are you fully adjacent with
that neighbour?
> Could you help me to find a solution to my problem ?
strange.
> Thanking you in advance :
>
> H
regards,
--
Paul Jakma address@hidden address@hidden Key ID: 64A2FF6A
warning: do not ever send email to address@hidden
Fortune:
To the systems programmer, users and applications serve only to provide a
test load.