[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!
From: |
Einar Karttunen |
Subject: |
Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?! |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:24:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On 12.11 16:12, Erik Bågfors wrote:
> Should we get this thing started?? Could people please say if they are
> interested in helping and what they want to do?
I could work on either on the compiler implementation, or implementing
Ruby standard library on top of parrot.
I have some experience doing stuff like this, and have written few compilers
and VMs. However I don't currently have the time to start designing things.
I'd love to use a parser understanding EBNF as a basis instead of the
parsers currently available wich interact directly with bison/yacc.
I think I could write a such parser before christmas in Ruby. This would
help other projects also. Of course the first goal is a stable API and
not performance.
We can cheat a little bit in the compiler, as we don't have to do stuff
like register assigments/overflow ourselves. As there is a tool for
doing that from symbolic parrot assembler code.
- Einar Karttunen
- [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!, David Robins, 2002/11/12
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!, Erik Bågfors, 2002/11/12
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!, Erik Bågfors, 2002/11/13
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!, Phil Tomson, 2002/11/14
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!, Dan Sugalski, 2002/11/14
- [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel, David Robins, 2002/11/14
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel, Phil Tomson, 2002/11/14
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel, Sean Chittenden, 2002/11/20
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel, Phil Tomson, 2002/11/20