[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Adding iset to core and using it for Unico
|
From: |
Peter Bex |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Adding iset to core and using it for Unicode-capable SRFI-14. |
|
Date: |
Sun, 3 Feb 2013 15:36:28 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:10:25PM +0900, Alex Shinn wrote:
> Alternately we can drop iset and just define everything
> in terms of chars to begin with, but I think iset is useful.
Could you elaborate on this comment? I don't understand what
you mean by "define everything in terms of chars".
> The libchicken size on my machine is about 100k larger.
> This should be reclaimed after the next change which
> would redefine the irregex char-sets in terms of SRFI-14.
> The change after that defines the utf8 egg char-sets in
> terms of the core.
Why did you chose to import the entire iset egg? It would
make more sense to migrate the cset stuff from irregex into
srfi-14 and change irregex to use srfi-14, wouldn't it?
This would mean less code, overall.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx