[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #568
From: |
Jim Ursetto |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #568 |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Feb 2013 14:54:04 -0600 |
On Feb 3, 2013, at 2:05 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 12:00:42PM -0800, Kon Lovett wrote:
>> On Feb 3, 2013, at 11:50 AM, Peter Bex <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> That reminds me: in posixunix.scm the read-line code sets some slot
>>> number 5. I was unable to figure out what this was for. It seems to
>>> update it to the current position in the buffer while it's scanning and
>>> then resets it to 0 at the end, but this isn't used anywhere I could see.
>>
>> ; 4 row (fixnum)
>> ; 5 col (fixnum)
>
> Now the million dollar question is why other ports don't seem to be
> using this anymore.
They had better be using it, since it is relied on in
port-position, which worked when I tried it on a string
port and a file port yesterday...
Jim
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #568, Felix, 2013/02/03
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #568, Christian Kellermann, 2013/02/14