[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] wishlist entry: distinguished values for boolean c
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] wishlist entry: distinguished values for boolean constants in type declarations |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:53:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:50:31PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> To be consistent with the handling of other distinguished objects like
> "()" (expressed as "null") and the eof-of-file-object (likewise "eof")
> it would be great, if we had "true" and "false" to restrict these
> beyond the rather generic "boolean" in those cases.
I ran into this one as well, in the case where declarations for pointer
types confuse the scrutinizer. There's a ticket for it:
https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/847
> Feasible?
Unsure. I hope so!
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net