[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] verify syntax in => cond clauses
From: |
Christian Kellermann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] verify syntax in => cond clauses |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:23:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
* Peter Bex <address@hidden> [130605 20:10]:
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:02:42PM -0700, Evan Hanson wrote:
> > This patch improves cond's behavior on clauses which contain `=>` but do
> > not match the precise definition of cond.
>
> Excellent patch, thanks! I signed it off as-is.
I have pushed it, thanks.
Cheers,
Christian
--
In the world, there is nothing more submissive and weak than
water. Yet for attacking that which is hard and strong, nothing can
surpass it. --- Lao Tzu