[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Bug in numbers egg (perhaps in scrutiny)
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Bug in numbers egg (perhaps in scrutiny) |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:37:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 01:38:24AM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> The following script works correctly in csi, but produces a warning in csc:
>
> (use numbers)
> (define (foo x) (odd? x))
>
> The output is as follows:
>
> Warning: in toplevel procedure `foo':
> (foo.scm:2) in procedure call to `numbers#odd?', expected 2 arguments, but
> was given 1 argument
>
> If you comment out "(use numbers)", there is no warning.
Hi John,
Thanks for reporting this. I've already fixed this a while ago:
https://bugs.call-cc.org/changeset/31835/release/4/numbers/trunk/numbers.types
There will be a new major numbers release before the end of January
which will include this fix.