[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Move `system' into (chicken process) [Was: Re: [PATCH] Move `system' into (chicken base)]

[Peter Bex]

On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:22:34PM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Fair enough. I still think it'd be convenient to keep in base, but I
> understand what you're saying.
> 
> I was mostly looking for low-hanging fruit that would be easy to move
> out of the toplevel, but it will be equally easy to simply move the
> Scheme-side definition into posix.scm now and worry about moving the
> implementation later, so if `system' is indeed going in the process
> library then I think that'd be a good first step.

Here's a patch to make it so.  I'm not sure what you mean about moving
the implementation though?  Were you referring to the C implementation?
I think it's best to keep that in runtime.c

Cheers,
Peter

0001-Move-system-into-chicken.process-posix.scm.patch
Description: Text Data

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature