[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Move port procedures out of toplevel and d
|
From: |
Evan Hanson |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Move port procedures out of toplevel and drop most "chicken" imports |
|
Date: |
Fri, 9 Feb 2018 11:04:48 +1300 |
On 2018-01-28 13:55, Peter Bex wrote:
> One suggestion: Given that input-port-open? and output-port-open? are
> in chicken.base, I would find it more intuitive to have port-closed? in
> chicken.base as well. What do you think?
Sounds good. Here's an updated patch.
Evan
0001-Move-port-procedures-out-of-toplevel-and-drop-most-c.patch
Description: Text Data
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Move port procedures out of toplevel and drop most "chicken" imports,
Evan Hanson <=