[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-janitors] Re: #394: implicit renaming macros
From: |
Chicken Trac |
Subject: |
[Chicken-janitors] Re: #394: implicit renaming macros |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:36:40 -0000 |
#394: implicit renaming macros
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: sjamaan | Owner: felix
Type: enhancement | Status: closed
Priority: not urgent at all | Milestone: 4.7.0
Component: expander | Version: 4.6.x
Resolution: fixed | Keywords: ir-macros, reverse, er-macros
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Comment(by sjamaan):
Here's a patch for the manual. I've also added a few words to the ER macro
text, as well as fixed a potential bug in the "cond" example (the
recursive call to cond wasn't renamed). Since it's a tutorial, we might
as well be pedantic. I've added an explanation of this potential bug to
the tutorial too.
By the way, what do you think about changing the ER macro examples to
explicitly use er-macro-transformer? This would make it a little clearer
I think (less people wondering "why do we need to use ir-macro-transformer
here but nothing there?")
--
Ticket URL: <http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/394#comment:3>
Chicken Scheme <http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/>
Chicken Scheme is a compiler for the Scheme programming language.
- [Chicken-janitors] #394: implicit renaming macros, Chicken Trac, 2010/09/21
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #394: implicit renaming macros, Chicken Trac, 2010/09/21
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #394: implicit renaming macros, Chicken Trac, 2010/09/26
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #394: implicit renaming macros,
Chicken Trac <=
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #394: implicit renaming macros, Chicken Trac, 2010/09/26
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #394: implicit renaming macros, Chicken Trac, 2010/09/26
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #394: implicit renaming macros, Chicken Trac, 2010/09/26