[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-janitors] Re: #398: Nested let-syntax failure to strip renamed
From: |
Chicken Trac |
Subject: |
[Chicken-janitors] Re: #398: Nested let-syntax failure to strip renamed identifiers |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:28:50 -0000 |
#398: Nested let-syntax failure to strip renamed identifiers
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: sjamaan | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7.0
Component: expander | Version: 4.6.x
Resolution: | Keywords: expander, renamed identifiers
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Comment(by sjamaan):
Why not add this property setting code to gensym? It seems like a useful
thing to keep around on all generated symbols, even outside the context of
Chicken core.
Here's a silly idea: I don't know how and where gensym is usually used,
but I can imagine it might even make sense to have a procedure (original-
symbol-name <sym>) which retrieves this property, if available, to "undo"
gensym calls. If not available, it would just return its argument
unmodified.
--
Ticket URL: <http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/398#comment:11>
Chicken Scheme <http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/>
Chicken Scheme is a compiler for the Scheme programming language.
- [Chicken-janitors] #398: Nested let-syntax failure to strip renamed identifiers, Chicken Trac, 2010/09/22
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #398: Nested let-syntax failure to strip renamed identifiers, Chicken Trac, 2010/09/22
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #398: Nested let-syntax failure to strip renamed identifiers, Chicken Trac, 2010/09/26
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #398: Nested let-syntax failure to strip renamed identifiers, Chicken Trac, 2010/09/26
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #398: Nested let-syntax failure to strip renamed identifiers, Chicken Trac, 2010/09/26
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #398: Nested let-syntax failure to strip renamed identifiers, Chicken Trac, 2010/09/26
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #398: Nested let-syntax failure to strip renamed identifiers, Chicken Trac, 2010/09/26
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #398: Nested let-syntax failure to strip renamed identifiers, Chicken Trac, 2010/09/27
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #398: Nested let-syntax failure to strip renamed identifiers, Chicken Trac, 2010/09/28
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #398: Nested let-syntax failure to strip renamed identifiers, Chicken Trac, 2010/09/28
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #398: Nested let-syntax failure to strip renamed identifiers,
Chicken Trac <=
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #398: Nested let-syntax failure to strip renamed identifiers, Chicken Trac, 2010/09/29
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #398: Nested let-syntax failure to strip renamed identifiers, Chicken Trac, 2010/09/29