[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules
From: |
Chicken Trac |
Subject: |
[Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 12:11:58 -0000 |
#445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mario | Owner: felix
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7.0
Component: unknown | Version: 4.6.x
Resolution: | Keywords:
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Comment(by felix):
I think the problem is that `##sys#canonicalize-body` compares the
starting expressions of bodies with an `eq?` on the result of `lookup`.
The expansion of `define-record` expands into definitions with a renamed
version of `define`, and the lookup returns the global toplevel definition
of `define` which does not compare `eq?` with `'define`. Just a hunch, but
this must somehow be the reason (this or something similar). Perhaps we
should use a different lookup routine in this case: just `eq?` comparison
with the symbol or it's macro-alias (if it exists).
--
Ticket URL: <http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/445#comment:4>
Chicken Scheme <http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/>
Chicken Scheme is a compiler for the Scheme programming language.
- [Chicken-janitors] #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules, Chicken Trac, 2010/12/09
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules, Chicken Trac, 2010/12/09
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules, Chicken Trac, 2010/12/10
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules, Chicken Trac, 2010/12/10
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules,
Chicken Trac <=
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules, Chicken Trac, 2010/12/11
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules, Chicken Trac, 2010/12/12
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules, Chicken Trac, 2010/12/16
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules, Chicken Trac, 2010/12/16
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules, Chicken Trac, 2010/12/20