[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent
From: |
felix |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Aug 2002 21:11:09 +0200 |
Peter Keller wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I notice in the manual it speaks of chicken versions of C types.
> Why isn't there a C type for long* and unsigned long*? Zlib has a lot
> of functions that desire that type. And I KNOW on say linux / ia64 long
> is 8 bytes, but int is 4 bytes so it makes a difference.
>
Hm, sounds sensible.
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Peter Keller, 2002/08/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent,
felix <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Peter Keller, 2002/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, felix, 2002/08/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Peter Keller, 2002/08/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, felix, 2002/08/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Peter Keller, 2002/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, felix, 2002/08/25