[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent
From: |
Benedikt Rosenau |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Aug 2002 21:47:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.4i |
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 10:00:07PM -0500, Peter Keller wrote:
> Why isn't there a C type for long* and unsigned long*? Zlib has a lot
> of functions that desire that type. And I KNOW on say linux / ia64 long
> is 8 bytes, but int is 4 bytes so it makes a difference.
Assuming any type size for integer or pointers is mined territory
anyway. Perl's configure shows how it can be done almost right.
Benedikt
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Peter Keller, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Perry E. Metzger, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Peter Keller, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Perry E. Metzger, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Benedikt Rosenau, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, tonyg, 2002/08/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, felix, 2002/08/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Perry E. Metzger, 2002/08/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Peter Keller, 2002/08/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Perry E. Metzger, 2002/08/27
Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent,
Benedikt Rosenau <=
Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Peter Keller, 2002/08/18