Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent

[Peter Keller]

On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 09:11:09PM +0200, felix wrote:
> Peter Keller wrote:
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I notice in the manual it speaks of chicken versions of C types.
> > Why isn't there a C type for long* and unsigned long*? Zlib has a lot
> > of functions that desire that type. And I KNOW on say linux / ia64 long
> > is 8 bytes, but int is 4 bytes so it makes a difference.
> > 
> 
> Hm, sounds sensible. 

So, what is the verdict about this?

-pete