[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent
From: |
Peter Keller |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 09:46:01 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2i |
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:40:54AM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> However, what you *do* know is that the underlying types have to be
> one of 8, 16, 32 or 64 bit widths (or perhaps even 128 bits -- I don't
> know much about what long long's look like on some platforms.)
This above is not necessarily true. The sizeof(jmp_buf) is 48 bytes
and sizeof(sigset_t) is 16 bytes on my desktop. Don't forget about POSIX
structures like termios too.
-pete
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Peter Keller, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Perry E. Metzger, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Peter Keller, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Perry E. Metzger, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Benedikt Rosenau, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, tonyg, 2002/08/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, felix, 2002/08/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Perry E. Metzger, 2002/08/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent,
Peter Keller <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Perry E. Metzger, 2002/08/27
Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Benedikt Rosenau, 2002/08/17
Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Peter Keller, 2002/08/18