Re: [Chicken-users] Compile problem on cygwin

[Felix Winkelmann]

Jonah Beckford wrote:
> I am not sure if this is particular to my installation of cygwin, but my 
> gcc 3.2 blows up on syntax-case.c using -O3 optimization:
>  
> *************
> chicken syntax-case.scm -quiet -debug-level 0 -optimize-level 2 
> -include-path . -no-warnings  -output-file syntax-case.c -explicit-use
>  
> /bin/bash ./libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. 
> -DC_STACK_GROWS_DOWNWARD=1 
> -DC_INSTALL_LIB_HOME='"/usr/local/lib/chicken"' -DC_USE_C_DEFAULTS    
> -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H -fstrict-aliasing  -c -o 
> syntax-case.lo `test -f 'syntax-case.c' || echo './'`syntax-case.c
>  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -DC_STACK_GROWS_DOWNWARD=1 
> -DC_INSTALL_LIB_HOME=\"/usr/local/lib/chicken\" -DC_USE_C_DEFAULTS -O3 
> -fomit-frame-pointer -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H -fstrict-aliasing -c syntax-case.c  
> -DPIC -o .libs/syntax-case.o
>  
> cc1: Cannot allocate 786992560 bytes after allocating 95600640 bytes
> make: *** [syntax-case.lo] Error 1
> *************

syntax-case.c should be about 22k lines. Because of exactly this
problem a special declaration was added (compress-literals) to
reduce the amount of code needed to create the relatively large
literal objects in the file.

Actually, the "-no-warnings" option suppresses a warning about the
non-implemented declaration. I will have to fix that.

So: I guess you are using an old version of chicken to build from CVS,
right? What does "chicken -version" show? You need at least build 1088
to compile from sources:

http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/chicken-0.1088.tar.gz
http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/chicken-0.1097.tar.gz

(note that 1097 above is slightly older than the current CVS version)

>  
> The -O3 is standard for CHICKEN on cygwin ... I could implement a 
> standard partitioning algorithm (which will have to minimize the number 
> of cross-file continuation/function calls while maximizing the number 
> of continuations in a given file, so we get the maximum optimization 
> possible) to split up CHICKEN generated .c files so they don't get so 
> large.  Anyone have any other suggestions or an objection?
>
> The modification would probably look like:
> % chicken syntax-case.scm -split 4 -output-prefix syntax-case
> which would generate four files: syntax-case[1-4].c

That's a pretty cool idea. How difficult would that be? Wouldn't
you need quite a lot of information about call-sites/-targets?
(which isn't always available).


cheers,
felix