[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] size of the symbol table
|
From: |
Sven Hartrumpf |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] size of the symbol table |
|
Date: |
Mon, 21 Apr 2003 15:33:30 +0200 (CEST) |
On 11 Apr 2003, Felix Winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>Try it out. If you have *very* many symbols, it might improve
> >>symbol table lookup.
> >
> >
> > O.K. I will do some testing and report my findings if they look
> > interesting.
> > Ooops! If I use -:t8 (-:t8k, ... all other values I tried with examples/mmcp
> > and other programs), I get a "Segmentation fault":
...
Felix' fix (which also appeared in CVS) works for me. Thanks!
I have timed many different values, but it appeared that for my programs
symbol table size does not really matter.
Does anybody have different experiences?
Ciao
Sven