RE: [Chicken-users] Bug in implementation for srfi-40?

[Jonah Beckford]

Thanks Alejo!

BTW, could the feature 'srfi-40 be turned on when the egg is used in the
next version (or before it is uploaded to the CHICKEN egg website).  Adding
"(register-feature! 'srfi-40)" at the top of srfi-40.scm was all I needed to
do to make it consistent with the other srfi extensions.

Thanks again, Jonah

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf
> Of Alejandro Forero Cuervo
> Sent: July 9, 2004 3:36 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in implementation for srfi-40?
> 
> 
> I fixed  the srfi-40  egg according  to the fix  for the  code in
> srfi-45 [1].  As  the egg is soo small (3k),  I'm attaching it to
> this message; I  hope that's alright.  For  convenience, I'm also
> attaching a diff of the original egg and my version.
> 
> I also  decided to  export stream-error,  as the  exported macros
> depend on it.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Alejo.
> http://bachue.com/alejo
> 
> ---=(  Comunidad de Usuarios de Software Libre en Colombia  )=---
> ---=(  http://bachue.com/colibri )=--=( address@hidden  )=---