[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] problems with SRFI-10 implementation
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] problems with SRFI-10 implementation |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 07:34:16 +0200 |
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 19:16:12 +0200, Thomas Chust <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Oops, you're right. But this is very counter-intuitive, isn't it? In my
> eyes, every data object should evaluate to itself, because otherwise
> (like in this example) there are objects which cannot be evaluated at
> all! Well, it's probably more a question of taste...
>
It is, I guess. Scheme vectors aren't self-evaluating as well (and the
empty list), so it's probably ok. It also helps catching certain
errors.
cheers,
felix