Re: [Chicken-users] The Test Infrastructure

[Sergey Khorev]

1. No 'setup' actions (in XP terminology).
2. Adding 'teardown' actions looks too imperative (and uncomfortable)
rather that declarative (declarative approach can be observed in
SchemeUnit).
3. It seems that destructor actions will not be called if expectation fails.
4. Testing infrastructure forces the actions without 'expect' to be
put to the 'side-effect' form.
5. I don't like to give names to _every_ expectation.

1+2 lead to a very large and clumsy tests cases.

Although I'm using it anyway =)