[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: can you believe it? compile time vs. run time is
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: can you believe it? compile time vs. run time issues, again! |
Date: |
Sun, 29 May 2005 13:43:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 07:16:05AM -0400, Michele Simionato wrote:
> Cool! But I would get the same effect if "match" and "more-macros" would
> (declare (run-time-macros)), right? I still think this would be the natural
> solution, since it is natural to think that `eval` knows about all standard
> Chicken extensions, the same that are enabled in the interpreter by default,
> unless I specify a r5rs environment. As you know, I really wish for
> consistent behavior between interpreted code and compiled code.
I second that wish!
> I changed the code according to you suggestions and I don't see any
> error now. I am happy with that, who knows what I did before? ;)
That's the problem, it's often hard to keep track of all these switches and
options that deal with macros, run-time vs compile-time etc.
Peter
--
http://www.student.kun.nl/peter.bex
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth
pgpvw5M4xAw7f.pgp
Description: PGP signature