chicken-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] Re: can you believe it? compile time vs. run time is


From: Peter Bex
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: can you believe it? compile time vs. run time issues, again!
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 13:43:10 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 07:16:05AM -0400, Michele Simionato wrote:
> Cool! But I would get the same effect if "match" and "more-macros" would
> (declare (run-time-macros)), right? I still think this would be the natural
> solution, since it is natural to think that `eval` knows about all standard
> Chicken extensions, the same that are enabled in the interpreter by default,
> unless I specify a r5rs environment. As you know, I really wish for
> consistent behavior between interpreted code and  compiled code.

I second that wish!

> I changed the code according to you suggestions and I don't see any
> error now. I am happy with that, who knows what I did before? ;)

That's the problem, it's often hard to keep track of all these switches and
options that deal with macros, run-time vs compile-time etc.

Peter
-- 
http://www.student.kun.nl/peter.bex
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth

Attachment: pgpvw5M4xAw7f.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]