Re: [Chicken-users] current status of tinyclos?

[felix winkelmann]

On 8/17/05, Rick Taube <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> yes i saw meroon as i poked around more through the docs but i do use
> multiple inheritance and i didnt see any real advantages to giving up
> clos expressiveness. its hard enough me trying to use one oop system in
> different lisps!

Understandable.

> 
> > Q3: What are you missing most desperately from Chicken, or better:
> >   if there is one thing that you really want it to have, what would
> > that be?
> 
> well...a more expressive and faster [not-so-tiny]clos would be really
> great! you could call it COOPs =:)

I really have to get the macros in shape for basic things like default
initargs, etc. 
For performance tuning, I think I can't do much - the code is already
bummed quite a lot.

> 
> coops: (1) farm buildings for housing poultry (2) Chicken Object
> Oriented Programming System
> 

Brilliant! :-)


cheers,
felix