Re: [Chicken-users] require-extension and the compiler

[Shawn Rutledge]

On 9/25/05, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> I recommend running spiffy exclusively in csi, since you need
> an interpreter with all non-standard macros anyway.
> Alternatively, do an
>
> (eval '(require-extension chicken-more-macros))
>
> at runtime to have non-standard syntax available (but
> the macro-expanders are interpreted, then. Also needs a newer
> chicken).
> To have a fully compiled, custom interpreter with non-standard
> syntax, put
>
> (declare (run-time-macros))
> (include "chicken-more-macros")

This seems to work, thanks.  What are the disadvantages of doing it
this way as opposed to running it in csi?