[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools
From: |
Tony Garnock-Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools |
Date: |
Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:44:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) |
Ashley Bone wrote:
> The most common settings are handled by scons (for instance, things like
> -fPIC for gcc or /MD for msvc).
> Special flags like optimizations and so forth have to be explicitly
> added, but I think that's true of any tool.
The crucial question is going to be libtool-type support. How well do
any of these tools cope with building different styles of shared
library/DLL?
Tony
- Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Thomas Chust, 2005/10/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Brandon J. Van Every, 2005/10/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Thomas Chust, 2005/10/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Ashley Bone, 2005/10/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools,
Tony Garnock-Jones <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Brandon J. Van Every, 2005/10/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Patrick Brannan, 2005/10/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Thomas Chust, 2005/10/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Brandon J. Van Every, 2005/10/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Thomas Chust, 2005/10/05