Re: [Chicken-users] objc egg

[Zbigniew]

Thanks Raffael.  The unit test was for internal use only at the moment
and I forgot to fix it.  I wrote it when this egg was a port of the
Gauche-ObjC bridge.  Later I rewrote from scratch but kept the unit
test for verification.  That particular test is expected to "fail"
right now, so no worries.  Actually, there are a lot of tests that
need to be added.

On 12/13/05, Raffael Cavallaro <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 13, 2005, at 7:21 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:
>
>
> As it currently happens quite a lot that I forget crucial files, please
>
> give it a try and tell me whether anything is missing.
> It seems to all be there - make in the test directory compiles the
> temperature converter cocoa application which runs successfully on my
> machine with Mac OS X 10.4.3, and the docs are in the egg too.
>
> All the tests in /tests/unit-test.scm which are currently implemented pass
> save one:
>
> ;; 14. Null object return is #f
> (objc TypeTest returnNullObject)
> ;; ==> #<objc-instance #f>
> ;; FAILED!  Expected:
> ;;     #f
>
>
> A couple of minor nits - the very first line of unit-test.scm which now
> reads:
>
> (use zobjc testeez typetest)
>      ^^^^^
>
> should probably now read:
>
> (use objc testeez typetest)
>
> since the egg has been renamed.
>
> Similarly, you may want to change the first  arg of testeez from
> "Gauche-Objective C bridge" to "Chicken-Objective C bridge" or
> "Gauche/Chicken-Objective C bridge" or something like that just to avoid
> confusion (since I've used both gosh and chicken I thought at first I had
> inadvertently run the wrong test suite for a moment!).
>
> Finally, it might be nice if the setup ran the tests, but maybe this is more
> output than the average user wants?
>
> Thanks again to both of you - this is really nice work!
>
>
> regards,
>
> Ralph
>
> Raffael Cavallaro, Ph.D.
> address@hidden
>