[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] set-finalizer! and cons
From: |
Zbigniew |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] set-finalizer! and cons |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:36:46 -0600 |
Sorry if I'm being dense---why does it need to release any finalizers
at all, if the pending buffer is totally empty? I thought the size of
the pending buffer was the issue here.
On 1/23/06, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> The runtime system doesn't know at that time how many of the
> finalizers will become free after the next GC, so it conservatively
> forces a GC in the hope of releasing some of them.