Re: [Chicken-users] objc egg v0.4

[Kon Lovett]

No, I do not support a chg. I was just thinking of the text form  
abbreviation of Objective-C. Your right, "obj-c:class-name" is more  
confusing.

Best Wishes,
Kon


On Jan 21, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Zbigniew wrote:

> On 1/21/06, Kon Lovett <address@hidden> wrote:
> >         objc:box/unbox instead of objc:wrap/unwrap
>
> That's not a bad idea.
>
> >         obj-c:* instead of objc:*)?
>
> The "objc" prefix is, near as I can tell, universal in Lisp--OpenMCL,
> Gauche--and other implementations---Python, Ruby, even Emacs'
> objc-mode---and I think we should stick with that.  On a personal
> note, I find obj-c:class-name to be more visually confusing than
> objc:class-name.  Of course, if enough people support a change I will
> make it.