Re: [Chicken-users] is C_NO_PIC_NO_DLL necessary?

[Brandon J. Van Every]

felix winkelmann wrote:

On 2/13/06, Brandon J. Van Every <address@hidden> wrote:
  

Is C_NO_PIC_NO_DLL really important?  It is used for static libraries,
and Makefile.am has the following notation:

# we add -DC_NO_PIC_NO_DLL seperately so that chicken-config does not
# use -DC_NO_PIC_NO_DLL ... -DC_NO_PIC_NO_DLL is only for libtool
# compiles

    

It's needed to compile statically linked apps on Windows. It's a bit
clunky, but does the job and should not bother the user as long
as he/she is using csc.
  

So is the comment "-DC_NO_PIC_NO_DLL is only for libtool compiles" wrong then?


Cheers,
Brandon Van Every