Re: [Chicken-users] complex number procedures

[felix winkelmann]

Yes, that makes sense. It will be available in the dacs head shortly.


cheers,
felix

On 3/17/06, Alex Shinn <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Wishlist: the following definitions are reasonable in a Scheme without
> imaginary numbers:
>
>   (define (real-part x) x)
>   (define (imag-part x) 0)
>   (define magnitude abs)
>   (define (angle x) 0)
>
> If these were provided in the core it would be easier to write code
> that works regardless of whether or not the numbers egg is being used.
>
> --
> Alex
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
>