Re: [Chicken-users] Compiler or interpreter?

[felix winkelmann]

On 3/28/06, John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
> Alex Shinn scripsit:
>
> > Not a procedure, but you can
>
> Ah, cool.  So you can define your own procedure thus:
>
> (cond-expand (compiling (define (compiled?) #t)) (else (define (compiled?) 
> #f)))

For example. Or call

(test-feature? 'script)          ; running via csi -s
(test-feature? 'compiling)   ; running as a compiler extension (-X)
(test-feature? 'csi)               ; running in csi


cheers,
felix