[Chicken-users] Re: array-lib and csc -- tried on fresh chicken install

[Kon Lovett]

On May 1, 2006, at 4:54 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:

> This seems to help for me. Kon: is this correct?

Yes. Current release is 1.2. (Fixed the below earlier, but later than  
0.8, Sorry, I thought the relationship require-at-runtime was  
transitive.)

For now, if people only need the facilities of SRI-47 they are better  
off using it. Array-lib has faster indexing but slower construction  
(See egg html doc Issues section). Fixing this is non-trivial.

> % svn diff array-lib.setup
> Index: array-lib.setup
> ===================================================================
> --- array-lib.setup     (revision 377)
> +++ array-lib.setup     (working copy)
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
>        '(
>                (version "0.8")
>                (documentation "array-lib.html")
> -               (require-at-runtime array-lib-sem)
> +               (require-at-runtime array-lib array-lib-sem)
>        )
> )
>
>
> cheers,
> felix
>
> On 4/29/06, Dan <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hi Felix,
> >
> > I have tried with a fresh install of chicken-2.3,
> > compiled without procedure-tables. The following
> > simple source works with csi, but not with csc:
> >
> > (require-extension box)
> > (display "Box: ") (display make-box) (newline)
> > (require-extension array-lib)
> > (display "make-array: ") (display make-array)
> > (newline)
> >
> > After csc:
> >
> > Box: #<procedure>
> > Error: unbound variable: make-array
> >
> > So, I think there must be something about the
> > array-lib extension that breaks. As it stands, I can't
> > compile my code.
> >
> > Any opinions? Am I way off here? No time to
> > investigate? Please let me know either way.
> >
> > Best,
> > Dan
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com