Re: [Chicken-users] address@hidden: Re: gettext cvs, woe32 dlls]

[Brandon J. Van Every]

John Cowan wrote:
> Here's a followup to my previous barking-dog post.  Presumably
> what is laid down should be more widely applicable.
I have no idea what this is about, but it looks godawful painful.  It is 
also irrelevant to my Chicken ambitions, which is to ultimately move 
everything to CMake and dump the automake toolchains for the crap that 
they are.  I realize this isn't going to make all __declspec issues go 
away, but life has been easy enough so far.  I've made progress on 
bootstrapping in the past couple of days, I'm pretty close to generating 
.scm --> .c --> libs.  More news once I check in darcs, sometime this 
weekend.


Cheers,
Brandon Van Every