Re: [Chicken-users] IEEE float arithmetic

[felix winkelmann]

On 6/20/06, Thomas Chust <address@hidden> wrote:
> Maybe something like that could be included in the library for
> completeness' sake. Or we should create an IEEE arithmetic egg (are there
> more functions than / in CHICKEN that are not IEEE compliant?). But I
> would really vote against modifying the behaviour of /.

Additionally, you can of course do

(condition-case (/ 1 0) (exn (exn arithmetic) "doh!"))


cheers,
felix