|
| From: | felix winkelmann |
| Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] s11n among different chicken versions |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:23:01 +0200 |
On 7/21/06, Daishi Kato <address@hidden> wrote:
Does SRFI-10 keep identity? In other words, how can it handle this: (let ([x (cons 1 1)]) (cons x x))
No, it's just a means of extending the reader.
OK, it seems s11n is easier for my purpose. Although I still do not understand the internals of s11n, my proposal is to allow deserialize to have an optional fallback deserializer, just like serialize has an optional fallbak serializer; why not?
Good point. I'll take a look. cheers, felix -- http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br:8081/blog/blog.ssp
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |