Re: [Chicken-users] s11n among different chicken versions

[Daishi Kato]

So, this actually is a correct way of using fallback, isn't it?
OK, I'll look for my real problem.
About the safety, don't worry too much, since this is just
a temporal solution, and
I already confirmed with chicken-dump that procedures in my file are
only equal? and hash.

Daishi

On 8/1/06, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 8/1/06, Daishi Kato <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Looks like the s11n egg is updated. So I tried, only to see I'm
> > missing something.
> >
> > Here is my fallback func:
> >
> > (define (deserialize-fallback id)
> >   (cond ((string=? id "f_3497library.scm") ; chicken-2.315
> >          equal?)
> >         ((string=? id "f_6914extras.scm") ; chicken-2.315
> >          hash)
> >         (else
> >          (error "deserialize-fallback unknown id" id))))
> >
> > What is missing?
> >
>
> I haven't seen your error-message yet.
> (But note that this is likely to fail, since the ID will probably be re-used
> and now name different procedures. This approach is not safe).
>
>
> cheers,
> felix
> --
> http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br:8081/blog/blog.ssp