[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Comparative build speed for CMake and autotools
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Comparative build speed for CMake and autotools |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:05:25 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
address@hidden scripsit:
> BTW: Are the 2 resulting chicken binaries byte-identical?
> (Sorry, if this question is naive - I should have followed
> the discussion more closely :-( )
No, they're not identical. I got interested in why, and found
there are some discrepancies between the chicken-config.h and
chicken-defaults.h files generated by the two build processes.
1) In the autotools version of chicken-defaults.h, C_INSTALL_CFLAGS
contains the additional options "-Os -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing
-Wall -Wno-unused -Wno-uninitialized".
2) In the autotools version of chicken-defaults.h, C_INSTALL_MORE_LIBS
and C_INSTALL_MORE_STATIC_LIBS contain the additional switch "-ldl"
before anything else.
A quick look at the chicken-config.h diffs doesn't show anything that
looks significant: I'm attaching the diff here in case Brandon or
Felix wants to run an eye or two over it.
--
John Cowan address@hidden http://ccil.org/~cowan
I must confess that I have very little notion of what [s. 4 of the British
Trade Marks Act, 1938] is intended to convey, and particularly the sentence
of 253 words, as I make them, which constitutes sub-section 1. I doubt if
the entire statute book could be successfully searched for a sentence of
equal length which is of more fuliginous obscurity. --MacKinnon LJ, 1940
config-diffs.txt
Description: Text document
- [Chicken-users] Comparative build speed for CMake and autotools, John Cowan, 2006/09/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comparative build speed for CMake and autotools, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/09/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comparative build speed for CMake and autotools, Sven . Hartrumpf, 2006/09/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comparative build speed for CMake and autotools,
John Cowan <=
- [Chicken-users] re: binaries are not byte identical, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/09/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] re: binaries are not byte identical, John Cowan, 2006/09/06
- [Chicken-users] optimization flags, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] optimization flags, felix winkelmann, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] optimization flags, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] optimization flags, felix winkelmann, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] optimization flags, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] optimization flags, John Cowan, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] optimization flags, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/09/07
- [Chicken-users] -ldl -ldl in Autoconf, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/09/07