[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Integrating unit tests into source code
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Integrating unit tests into source code |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:53:19 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
Brandon J. Van Every scripsit:
> I've never cared about contract programming, because I'm too saddled
> with performance concerns to worry about that.
"If it doesn't have to work, I can make it as fast as you want."
> Oops. The problem, in my point of view, is that you Unix guys are
> always setting up mailing lists to be "Reply To Sender."
Nothing to do with Unix; the convention much predates the use of
Unix to run the world's mailing lists.
> So I have to manually type the name of the list every time I reply.
Use the "Reply All" button. (The owner will get two copies, like you
are getting of this message; big deal.)
> Windows guys set up their mailing lists to be "Reply To List."
Until the first time that a *highly* confidential reply to the author,
possibly libeling another list participant, goes back to the list.
> Windozers go for what makes sense to the common man; "Reply" means
> "send it back to where it came from."
"Reply" means "reply to one (the author)"; "Reply All" means "reply to
all (the list)". What could be clearer?
> I will wager, furthermore, that a default of Reply-To-Author is a relic
> of a time when net curmudgeons didn't want you "wasting everyone's
> time" with your idle chit-chat. Force you to think about replying to
> the entire group, the entire world community, all the resources wasted
> on all those servers, oh my!
It isn't "all those servers", it's "all those brains". Why should 500
or 5000 mailing-list participants have to read (even enough to delete)
your personal, private, of-no-concern-to-anybody-else response?
--
Is a chair finely made tragic or comic? Is the John Cowan
portrait of Mona Lisa good if I desire to see address@hidden
it? Is the bust of Sir Philip Crampton lyrical, http://ccil.org/~cowan
epical or dramatic? If a man hacking in fury
at a block of wood make there an image of a cow,
is that image a work of art? If not, why not? --Stephen Dedalus
- [Chicken-users] Integrating unit tests into source code, felix winkelmann, 2006/12/14
- Re: [Chicken-users] Integrating unit tests into source code, elf, 2006/12/14
- Re: [Chicken-users] Integrating unit tests into source code, Peter Bex, 2006/12/14
- Re: [Chicken-users] Integrating unit tests into source code, felix winkelmann, 2006/12/14
- Message not available
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Integrating unit tests into source code, Peter Bex, 2006/12/14
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Integrating unit tests into source code, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/14
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Integrating unit tests into source code, Peter Busser, 2006/12/15
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Integrating unit tests into source code, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/15
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Integrating unit tests into source code, Peter Busser, 2006/12/15
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Integrating unit tests into source code, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/15
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Integrating unit tests into source code, Peter Busser, 2006/12/15
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Integrating unit tests into source code, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/15
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Integrating unit tests into source code, Peter Busser, 2006/12/15